The ending of Amsterdam reveals a conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government. The main characters expose the plot and thwart the villains’ plans.
“Amsterdam”, directed by David O. Russell, is a 2022 period mystery comedy thriller. The film features a star-studded cast, including Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington. The story revolves around three friends who reunite to uncover the truth behind a mysterious murder. The film is inspired by the Business Plot, a 1933 political conspiracy in the United States.
Plot Summary
Set in 1933, “Amsterdam” follows two World War I veterans, Burt Berendsen (Christian Bale) and Harold Woodsman (John David Washington). They are approached by Elizabeth Meekins (Taylor Swift) to investigate the suspicious death of her father, a retired general. As they delve deeper, they become suspects in Elizabeth’s murder and go on the run to uncover the truth. They reconnect with their old friend Valerie Voze (Margot Robbie) and become entangled in a plot against the U.S. government.
The trio discovers a movement aiming to overthrow the presidency and install a dictatorship. This faction, known as the Committee of the Five, hopes to recruit General Gil Dillenbeck (Robert De Niro) to lead their cause. However, Dillenbeck, opposed to their values, partners with Burt, Valerie, and Harold to thwart their plans.
The Climax
The climax of “Amsterdam” takes place at a veteran’s gala. The protagonists set a trap to expose the Committee of the Five’s plot. The business sharks behind the committee try to persuade Dillenbeck to join their cause. They promise to exploit vulnerable veterans under Roosevelt’s administration. However, Dillenbeck, with the help of Burt, Valerie, and Harold, reveals their true intentions to the public. This effectively dismantles their plans.
At the gala, the trio and Dillenbeck expose the Committee of the Five’s plot. The business sharks behind the committee try to persuade Dillenbeck to join their cause, promising to exploit vulnerable veterans under Roosevelt’s administration. However, Dillenbeck, with the help of Burt, Valerie, and Harold, reveals their true intentions to the public, effectively dismantling their plans.
Character Resolutions
- Burt Berendsen: Burt decides to stay in the country to continue his work and make it a better place. His character arc concludes with a sense of redemption and purpose. He chooses to fight for a better future despite the personal cost.
- Valerie Voze and Harold Woodsman: Valerie and Harold, realizing that they will never have a excellent life in the current political climate, decide to leave the country. They are reassured by their well-wishers, Paul and Henry, and set out for a new life together.
The film ends with original footage of Smedley Butler addressing Congress about the Nazi agenda. This inclusion serves to ground the fictional narrative in real historical events, adding a layer of authenticity to the story.
Critical Reception
“Amsterdam” received mixed reviews from critics. While the film was praised for its historical context, costume design, and performances, it was criticized for its convoluted plot and pacing issues. Some critics suggested that the story would have been better suited for a miniseries format, allowing for more in-depth exploration of the characters and subplots.
Positive Aspects
- Historical Accuracy: The film’s costume and production design were lauded for their historical accuracy, effectively transporting audiences to the 1930s.
- Performances: The A-list cast delivered strong performances, with Christian Bale’s portrayal of Burt Berendsen being particularly noteworthy for its depth and nuance.
Criticisms
- Plot Complexity: The film’s plot was deemed overly intricate, with too many subplots and characters, making it difficult for audiences to follow. The exposition-heavy scenes detracted from the overall narrative.
- Pacing Issues: The film’s pacing was criticized for being inconsistent, with some scenes dragging on while others felt rushed. This affected the overall coherence of the story.
Conclusion
“Amsterdam” ambitiously blends historical events with fictional narratives, featuring a star-studded cast and a intricate plot. While it succeeds in certain areas, such as historical accuracy and performances, it falls short in others, particularly in its storytelling and pacing. The film’s ending ties up the main plot points but leaves some subplots underdeveloped, suggesting that a miniseries format might have been more suitable for the story’s scope.
Despite its flaws, “Amsterdam” offers a stimulating exploration of friendship, loyalty, and the fight against fascism, set against the backdrop of 1930s America. It serves as a reminder of the importance of standing up for one’s values, even in the face of overwhelming odds.
References
